<< Vol 1, #1 (2019) Vol 2, #1 (2020) Vol 2, #2 (2020) >>
|
Articles |
V.M. Solovyev, V.S. Seleznev, V.V. Chechelnitsky, N.A. Galyova Upper mantle of Baikal and Transbaikalia according to the area data of seismological research ........................................................................................ 7
|
E.L. Lyskova, T.B. Yanovskaya, T.Yu. Koroleva Spatial distribution of the anisotropy coefficient in the European upper mantl ............................................................................................................ 18
|
V.G. Nikulins Modern seismological surveys in Latvia from 2008 to 2019 and prospects for their development .............................................................................................. 27
|
A.A. Malovichko, A.N. Morozov, N.V. Vaganova, V.E. Asming, R.A. Dyagilev, Z.A. Evtyugina The August 17, 1914 Bilimbaev earthquake: location based on instrumental data ................................................................................................... 40
|
A.F. Emanov, A.A. Emanov, A.V. Fateev Bachatskiy induced earthquake on June 18, 2013 ML=6.1, I0=7 (Kuzbass) ......................................................................................... 48
|
V.Yu. Cardanets Determination of parameters of historical earthquakes based on macroseismic data ................................................................................... 62
|
A.S. Fomochkina, B.G. Bukchin The comparative analysis of 2018 Alaska earthquakes from surface wave records ...................................................................................... 76
|
V.V. Karpinsky, V.E. Asming Results of the infrasonic array on the Valaam Island primary data processing .......................................................................................... 85
|
S.V. Shibaev, B.M. Kozmin, V.S. Imaev, L.P. Imaeva, A.F. Petrov, N.N. Starkova The February 14, 2013 Ilin-Tas (Abyi) earthquake (Mw=6.7), Northeast Yakutia .... 92
|
A.V. Mikheeva The correlation analysis of spatial anomalies of computed and measured fields by the GIS-ENDDB system ....................................................................................... 103
|
|